zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-April/004353.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-sysadm] is the svn server down?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20is%20the%20svn%20server%20down%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCAONrEtYRr3doX0pouhQuqtJh%3D8nMKyHxPjRFFZrqMn_MUG%3DFgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="004360.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-sysadm] is the svn server down?</H1>
    <B>Thierry Vignaud</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20is%20the%20svn%20server%20down%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCAONrEtYRr3doX0pouhQuqtJh%3D8nMKyHxPjRFFZrqMn_MUG%3DFgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-sysadm] is the svn server down?">thierry.vignaud at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Mon Apr  2 09:57:43 CEST 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004360.html">[Mageia-sysadm] is the svn server down?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#4353">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#4353">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#4353">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#4353">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 31 March 2012 18:16, Maarten Vanraes &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">alien at rmail.be</A>&gt; wrote:
&gt;<i> i think you're looking for distributed trunking? ie: having 2 cables in two
</I>&gt;<i> separate switches, so if a switch fails, it stays working...
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> but those switches are quite expensive, iinm at least 2kEUR/switch
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> non-distributed trunking is alot cheaper, but that just means half the servers
</I>&gt;<i> are down.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> or we could just not bond and have 2 different networks over such servers. that
</I>&gt;<i> also works for redundancy, but on l3 instead of l2 and alot cheaper...
</I>
At least:
1) this should be monitored
2) an alarm should be sent to this ml on warning (at least on critical)
</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="004360.html">[Mageia-sysadm] is the svn server down?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#4353">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#4353">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#4353">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#4353">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">More information about the Mageia-sysadm
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>