1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-sysadm] ML request for QAteam
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20ML%20request%20for%20QAteam&In-Reply-To=%3C20110404100518.GN21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003234.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="003242.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-sysadm] ML request for QAteam</H1>
<B>nicolas vigier</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20ML%20request%20for%20QAteam&In-Reply-To=%3C20110404100518.GN21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-sysadm] ML request for QAteam">boklm at mars-attacks.org
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Apr 4 12:05:18 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003234.html">[Mageia-sysadm] ML request for QAteam
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003242.html">[Mageia-sysadm] ML request for QAteam
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#3238">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#3238">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#3238">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#3238">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Fri, 01 Apr 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
><i>
</I>><i> You didn't comment on my suggestion about distro-test so I suspect that
</I>><i> it is not fine. So let's do a 2nd proposition, what about :
</I>><i>
</I>><i> <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">qa-discuss at ml</A>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> It say this is about qa ( qa )
</I>><i> It is clearly a discussion list, open to everybody ( -discuss )
</I>><i> It is separate from the idea of team ( which is a separate concept as we
</I>><i> both said ).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Moreover, qa is IMHO a better prefix for a potential qa-reports@ ( for
</I>><i> automated reports, like sysadmin-reports for puppet/xymon report ), for
</I>><i> qa-private@, or qa-security@, or
</I>><i> qa-updates@ or anything for a private list if needed as reminded by
</I>><i> Damien ( so we can do the vast majority of the work in the open and
</I>><i> still keep sensible issues separate, thus having both benefit ).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> And we could later have qa-announce@, qa-commits@, etc.
</I>
I think that's a good proposition. And it match what we are doing for
sysadmin lists, with sysadmin-commits@, sysadmin-bugs@,
sysadmin-reports@ and maybe sysadmin-discuss@ when we migrate the
current list from zarb.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003234.html">[Mageia-sysadm] ML request for QAteam
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003242.html">[Mageia-sysadm] ML request for QAteam
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#3238">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#3238">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#3238">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#3238">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">More information about the Mageia-sysadm
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
