summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000407.html
blob: 164402e98383cb54f0dd3b1eb237c65bdea4b273 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-sysadm] Usernames, uids, and groups
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Usernames%2C%20uids%2C%20and%20groups&In-Reply-To=%3C201011091414.42052.bgmilne%40multilinks.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000409.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000425.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-sysadm] Usernames, uids, and groups</H1>
    <B>Buchan Milne</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Usernames%2C%20uids%2C%20and%20groups&In-Reply-To=%3C201011091414.42052.bgmilne%40multilinks.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-sysadm] Usernames, uids, and groups">bgmilne at multilinks.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Nov  9 14:14:41 CET 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000409.html">[Mageia-sysadm] Usernames, uids, and groups
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000425.html">[Mageia-sysadm] Usernames, uids, and groups
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#407">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#407">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#407">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#407">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Monday, 8 November 2010 17:29:24 nicolas vigier wrote:
&gt;<i> Hello,
</I>
Why a new thread?

&gt;<i> On some machines like the svn server, we need to use pam_ldap to allow
</I>&gt;<i> users access with their ldap accounts. But on others servers like
</I>&gt;<i> alamut (web services), or the build nodes, normal users have no reason
</I>&gt;<i> to login.
</I>
But, sysadm members have a reason, and I see no reason to increase their 
overhead with local accounts.

&gt;<i> On those servers, do you think we should restrict access with
</I>&gt;<i> ssh configuration and a group, or disable pam_ldap completly on those
</I>&gt;<i> servers and only use local accounts ?
</I>
I was planning for pam_ldap's pam_groupdn option. E.g. a 'sysadm' group.

&gt;<i> We also need to decide what UID ranges we use for local accounts, and for
</I>&gt;<i> ldap accounts.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> And groups. I think we could use the following groups :
</I>&gt;<i>  * posix : promotes the user as posixAccount+sshPublicKey (in ldap), and
</I>&gt;<i>    allows access to the svn and git using svn+<A HREF="ssh://">ssh://</A> and git+<A HREF="ssh://">ssh://</A>
</I>
I think it would be better to try and provide VCS commit access without shell 
access. This is easy enough for subversion with mod_dav_svn.

&gt;<i>  * packager : allows commits in packages repository, package submit using
</I>&gt;<i>    mdvsys,
</I>
How are we submitting to mdvsys? Command-line? API?

&gt;<i>    additional permissions on bugzilla,
</I>
What permissions do packagers need that non-packager committer don't?

&gt;<i>    access to the packages
</I>&gt;<i>    maintainers database, etc ...
</I>

&gt;<i>  * web : for members of web team, allows commits in web repository
</I>&gt;<i>  * documentation, translator, qa, marketing, etc ... :
</I>&gt;<i>  * packagerapprentice, webapprentice, etc ... : for apprentices, with
</I>&gt;<i>    more restricted access
</I>
This is svn commit but no mdvsys access?

&gt;<i>  * sysadm : gives admin permissions on all applications
</I>
There is 'Account Admin' &quot;system&quot; group in LDAP, which allows any modification 
to any users. But, should system administration necessarily mean all access in 
all applications?

Regards,
Buchan
</PRE>













<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000409.html">[Mageia-sysadm] Usernames, uids, and groups
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000425.html">[Mageia-sysadm] Usernames, uids, and groups
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#407">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#407">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#407">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#407">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">More information about the Mageia-sysadm
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>