1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Vote for board
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Vote%20for%20board&In-Reply-To=%3C1331552967.1167.212.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006711.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="006712.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Vote%20for%20board&In-Reply-To=%3C1331552967.1167.212.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Mar 12 12:49:27 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006711.html">[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006712.html">[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6710">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6710">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6710">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6710">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le lundi 12 mars 2012 à 08:40 +0100, Remco Rijnders a écrit :
><i> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:34:14AM +0100, Maarten wrote in
</I>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">201203120834.14471.alien at rmail.be</A>>:
</I>><i> >Op maandag 12 maart 2012 07:56:30 schreef Remco Rijnders:
</I>><i> >[...]
</I>><i> >> While I support the candidacy of both candidates (if I have a say in it, I
</I>><i> >> don't know), but I think there still needs to be some sort of acclamation.
</I>><i> >> Imagine if someone unsuitable would volunteer and we have seats available?
</I>><i> >> Do we want to let them in unopposed?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> >I agree.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> >But otoh:
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> >Since only association members vote for board, and i think i see several team
</I>><i> >leaders already agreeing and noone disagreeing... i think this would qualify
</I>><i> >as being acclamated...
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> >i guess if this sort of procedure is being followed, all that is needed is a
</I>><i> >timelimit for someone to disagree and then the email of stating if the new
</I>><i> >members are accepted...
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I think what I tried to say... it is good to have the policies and
</I>><i> procedures clear up front and to stick to them, even when they might seem
</I>><i> overly bureaucratic to us now. In the future, when we might face issues,
</I>><i> it is good to have established procedures we can point to instead of
</I>><i> having people claim "but you did x back then".
</I>
Nice try, but as seen on -dev, when i try to follow the procedure and
rules, people complain, and when i don't, people ask me to do so.
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006711.html">[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006712.html">[Mageia-discuss] Vote for board
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6710">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6710">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6710">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6710">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
