blob: 072a666d0044401373454e8548dbf37f4f1caaad (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20mageia%20under%20vmware%20ESXi&In-Reply-To=%3C5092CFA1.10907%40ventoso.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008873.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="008875.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi</H1>
<B>Luca Olivetti</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20mageia%20under%20vmware%20ESXi&In-Reply-To=%3C5092CFA1.10907%40ventoso.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi">luca at ventoso.org
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Nov 1 20:38:09 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008873.html">[Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008875.html">[Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8874">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8874">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8874">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8874">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Al 01/11/12 16:04, En/na David Walser ha escrit:
>><i> Maybe nobody got in touch with vmware to have mageia listed as a "certified" distribution?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Not sure what it matters having it "certified."
</I>
To me less than zero, to my boss (scared by the vendor[*]) it seems it matters.
><i> I run several Mageia server VMs in ESXi at work and they work great.
</I>
I personally have no doubt that it works perfectly, but my opinion doesn't count.
[*]a vendor that has no experience with Linux and is proposing to migrate our samba/ldap setup to an active domain managed by windows server and files shared directly by a netapp filer (since they say that netapp only works with a "real" active directory implementation and cannot manage users permissions with ldap).
Bye
--
Luca
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008873.html">[Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008875.html">[Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8874">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8874">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8874">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8874">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|