1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Habemus%20logo&In-Reply-To=%3C201012111443.43324.terraagua%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003235.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="003233.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo</H1>
<B>MacXi</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Habemus%20logo&In-Reply-To=%3C201012111443.43324.terraagua%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo">terraagua at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Dec 11 17:43:43 CET 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003235.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003233.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#3228">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#3228">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#3228">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#3228">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Em Sábado 11 Dezembro 2010, às 08:51:10, Wolfgang Bornath escreveu:
><i> I want to point to skiper's blog, who gave the whole "Logo" issue some
</I>><i> thought. It is titled, "Mageia logo - I don't like it".
</I>><i>
</I>><i> But what he writes is very different from the usual "I don't like it,
</I>><i> it's ugly" posts. I explains in detail why he does not like it and why
</I>><i> he thinks it is not a good choice based on objective reasons. Although
</I>><i> I do not share his opinion I want to give credit to him because he did
</I>><i> not just complain, he put some thinking and time into explaining his
</I>><i> opinion.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> BTW: He explicitely states that he does not complain about the
</I>><i> decision finding process.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> <A HREF="http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-wit">http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-wit</A>
</I>><i> h-it/
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Good reading, even if it is not my opinion :)
</I>
Guys,
Obs: excuse my poor english, with the help (and the errors) of the tool-google
languages.
I think the logo Mageia is great.
Many years ago I was impressed with the millions of dollars spent by
Sony to make its logo, which resulted in nothing more than its simple name..
Was a surprise to me, so much money for just that. Now I understand that
simplicity of the logo can be a great advantage.
And I think that's not right to compare the new and raw mageia logo with the
logos already mature and polished after years of work and very money from big
companies.
The Mageia Linux community formed by volunteers and not by a company, I don't
see reason to change the logo or make another selection process. I think this
is a waste of time and effort (and ignores the work already done) and does not
educate, because, in my opinion, the selection process was transparent and
democratic and the outcome was appropriate.
So, congratulations to the team by Mageia overcome all these steps
organization of infrastructure and logo - which in my view is excellent -
Now, come to what is really essential: continue to organize everything
necessary to launch the alpha version of the Linux distribution mageia.
Hugs.
***************************************
Pessoal,
Obs: desculpem meu inglês fraco, com a ajuda (e os erros) da ferramenta
google- idiomas
Acho que a logomarca da Mageia está ótima.
Muitos anos atrás fiquei impressionado com os milhões de dólares gastos pela
Sony para fazer sua logomarca, que resultou em nada mais que seu nome simples.
Foi uma surpresa para mim, tanto dinheiro para só aquilo. Hoje entendo que a
simplicidade do logo pode ser uma grande vantagem.
E acho que não está certo comparar a nova e crua logomarca da Mageia com os
logos já lapidados e maduros após anos de trabalho e muito dinheiro de grandes
empresas.
A comunidade Mageia linux é formada por voluntários e não por uma
empresa. Não vejo motivo para trocar o logo ou fazer outro processo de
escolha. Acho isso um desperdício de tempo e trabalho (e desconsidera o
trabalho já feito) e não educa pois, na minha opinião, o processo de escolha
foi democrático e transparente e o resultado foi adequado.
Por isso, parabéns para a equipe Mageia por superar todas essas etapas de
organização da infraestrutura e do logo - que no meu entender está excelente -
Agora, vamos ao que realmente é essencial: continuar a organizar tudo que for
necessário para o lançamento da versão alfa da distribuição Mageia Linux.
Abraços.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003235.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003233.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#3228">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#3228">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#3228">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#3228">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
