1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Habemus%20logo&In-Reply-To=%3C4D038DC1.3090301%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003225.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="003229.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo</H1>
<B>Giuseppe Ghibò</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Habemus%20logo&In-Reply-To=%3C4D038DC1.3090301%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo">ghibomgx at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Dec 11 15:42:09 CET 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003225.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003229.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#3226">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#3226">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#3226">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#3226">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
><i> I want to point to skiper's blog, who gave the whole "Logo" issue some
</I>><i> thought. It is titled, "Mageia logo - I don't like it".
</I>><i>
</I>><i> But what he writes is very different from the usual "I don't like it,
</I>><i> it's ugly" posts. I explains in detail why he does not like it and why
</I>><i> he thinks it is not a good choice based on objective reasons. Although
</I>><i> I do not share his opinion I want to give credit to him because he did
</I>><i> not just complain, he put some thinking and time into explaining his
</I>><i> opinion.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> BTW: He explicitely states that he does not complain about the
</I>><i> decision finding process.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> <A HREF="http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/">http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/</A>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Good reading, even if it is not my opinion :)
</I>><i>
</I>
Yep, good reading, but IMHO a logo it's just a logo, though I had
preferred it to be more refined or cool too. But I think there is room
for 3D improvements maybe. At the first sight such logo appeared to me
as a "fish". Regarding the comments, the logo is something which should
immediately represent a product or a brand (even if you don't attach a
script), that's because called logo. The compass based logo sound cool,
but IMHO it represent at first sight a well painted compass.
Anyway once you see the logo several times at once you'll soon identify
it with the product. IMHO this is the power of a logo. A good experiment
could be: take all the distro logo (e.g. from distrowatch) in random
order then try to identify to which brand they own...
Bye
Giuseppe.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003225.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003229.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#3226">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#3226">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#3226">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#3226">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
