1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Suggestions: DE's, fallback and stability.
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions%3A%20DE%27s%2C%20fallback%20and%20stability.&In-Reply-To=%3C1287911907.22938.253.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002598.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002586.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions: DE's, fallback and stability.</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions%3A%20DE%27s%2C%20fallback%20and%20stability.&In-Reply-To=%3C1287911907.22938.253.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions: DE's, fallback and stability.">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Oct 24 11:18:27 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002598.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions: DE's, fallback and stability.
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002586.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2603">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2603">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2603">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2603">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le dimanche 24 octobre 2010 à 11:10 +0300, P. Christeas a écrit :
><i> Stability, IMHO, is not what Debian does: take 7 versions back and call them
</I>><i> "stable". It is the result of software quality procedures, objective choices
</I>><i> when deciding about code merges, "software engineering" when developing
</I>><i> something.
</I>
What Debian offer is stability at the distribution level, in the sense
"the software do not change", not really stability on software level, ie
what most people understand as "the software do not crash". I would
better call this a robust software than a stable one, due to the
confusion above.
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002598.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions: DE's, fallback and stability.
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002586.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2603">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2603">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2603">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2603">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|