1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions&In-Reply-To=%3C1287877602.22938.147.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002586.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002588.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions&In-Reply-To=%3C1287877602.22938.147.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Oct 24 01:46:42 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002586.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002588.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2587">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2587">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2587">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2587">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le dimanche 24 octobre 2010 à 00:59 +0200, Tux99 a écrit :
><i> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Dale Huckeby wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>><i> > One problem in choosing packages is that for many a description of what
</I>><i> > the app does is sparse or nonexistent. And often the description is of
</I>><i> > the form: defoliant_2.35.rpm. Install this if you need a defoliant. When
</I>><i> > I see descriptions like this my first impulse is to wonder, Why did you
</I>><i> > even bother? Complete descriptions of what each app does, including
</I>><i> > explaining under what circumstances the user might or might not need it,
</I>><i> > would go a long way towards making noobies feel less lost. Some apps do
</I>><i> > an admirable job of explanation. Many don't.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I 100% agree with that and this is something that the packagers really
</I>><i> should do. What's the point in packaging up a great useful app, but then
</I>><i> saving time on the description so nobody but a few insiders use it,
</I>><i> because nobody know what it is for?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Even I still come across packages I have never heard of and then wonder
</I>><i> what they are for, immagine a newbie who doesn't really know any of the
</I>><i> Linux apps by name.
</I>
Well, writing better description is a task that do not requires
technical knowledge, and that any packagers could do, if people send a
patch.
Since I never received anything for my own packages for this kind of
problem, shall I assume that my packages are fine ?
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002586.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002588.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2587">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2587">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2587">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2587">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
