blob: 3eb79026a9661811bdef2a620e1fd96cb218f874 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Package management system
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Package%20management%20system&In-Reply-To=%3C1285753477.3727.760.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001527.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="001546.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Package management system</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Package%20management%20system&In-Reply-To=%3C1285753477.3727.760.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Package management system">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Sep 29 11:44:37 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001527.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001546.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1544">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1544">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1544">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1544">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 à 10:50 +0800, Kira a écrit :
><i> 在 Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:46:34 +0800, Lirodon <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">superfox436 at gmail.com</A>>寫道:
</I>><i>
</I>><i> > Doesn't packagekit provide Gnome and KDE-native interfaces for package
</I>><i> > management?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Shawn
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> I don't check the process of packagekit, but isn't the urpmi backend of
</I>><i>
</I>><i> packagekit was immature? If so, then there's no big need of it if we are
</I>><i>
</I>><i> going to stick with urpmi .
</I>
I have worked on it a little on it, to complete it, and the patches were
accepted upstream. According to
<A HREF="http://www.packagekit.org/pk-matrix.html">http://www.packagekit.org/pk-matrix.html</A> , the only important part we
miss are :
InstallFiles and WhatProvides , which may not be too hard to code.
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001527.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001546.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1544">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1544">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1544">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1544">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|