zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000561.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia%20Forums&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTikyJhGzDiz0bs%3DYKMCTH2CetDNEo03i4zTdOYGx%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000551.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000571.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums</H1>
    <B>atilla ontas</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia%20Forums&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTikyJhGzDiz0bs%3DYKMCTH2CetDNEo03i4zTdOYGx%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums">tarakbumba at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Sep 21 21:17:42 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000551.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000571.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#561">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#561">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#561">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#561">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>What about Debian or ArchLinux organisation scheme with users
interaction? We can digg those to find a way of organisation. In my
opinion, two should be three parts of a decision maker group. Call it
assembly or whatever you want. First, members from Mageia developers
(coders, packagers, web site and wiki developers etc.), members from
local users communities.  I don't know who are the advocates as
mentioned in announcement. If Mageia will be a community driven
project and not a company product there must be community members in
board. I think %50-%50 developer-community ratio is fine. Local
communities should elect their representive by themselves. We can
elect our representive for 2 years. Thats how i think the decision
maker board should formed in.


OFFTOP&#304;C:  Mageia name is a bit weird for Turkish users. We even can't
pronounce them like European language speakers. If someone asked me
the distro name i'd rather prefer Magic Wand Linux...
</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000551.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000571.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#561">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#561">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#561">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#561">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>