blob: 55a80eb8c50917b6b1ec9c4804ecc501074ab84c (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
|
<p>Le 27 mai 2012 04:33, "Franklin Weng" <<a href="mailto:franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw">franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw</a>> a écrit :<br>
[...]</p>
<p>> Now my question is that, will the KDE update policy in<br>
> backports be still the same as before?<br>
><br>
> I remember that when discussing if Mageia 1 would have KDE 4.7 in<br>
> backports, the answer was no because that kdepim was too unstable.</p>
<p>It was part of the problem & used to show that it was not that easy to do it.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>> For Mageia 2, again I'd like to ask, if we will have KDE 4.9 in<br>
> backports after it releases in August?<br>
><br>
> (Yes, I know that I can upgrade my KDE using cauldron. But no, I<br>
> don't consider to upgrade my box with cauldron... it is far too<br>
> unstable than any version of kdepim.)</p>
<p>So here we've got some problems:<br>
- Backports are not functional.<br>
- Kde is still too big for a backport especially regarding our current (draft) backport policy where it should be validated by our QA. Not to mention that we'll have to update/backport somes dependencies to allow this.<br>
- I personally won't push it to backport.</p>
<p>Regards,<br>
</p>
|