blob: 3b9de4a8cc729c3e5677a5246866a822e13905ac (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
<p><br>
On Mar 11, 2012 12:38 PM, "Oliver Burger" <<a href="mailto:oliver.bgr@googlemail.com">oliver.bgr@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> 2012/3/11 Sander Lepik <<a href="mailto:sander.lepik@eesti.ee">sander.lepik@eesti.ee</a>>:<br>
> > It's a new package. How much harm can it do? I would understand this<br>
> > rejection if we would have backports enabled. But we don't. Some point<br>
> > release can cause more trouble than this package. This is getting<br>
> > ridiculous.<br>
> I have to agree with Sander here. In the meeting someone asked if<br>
> submitting new packages would still be able and the answer was<br>
> something like<br>
> "Yes, but we would prefer you to focus on fixing bugs".<br>
> Of course focusing on fixing bugs is a good thing, but we are still<br>
> almost two months before release and the fact that we don't have<br>
> backports (and probably never will :/ ) is a big problem.</p>
<p>As far as I know only packages with different version are rejected by your I, not new ones.<br>
</p>
|