blob: 3ae29f9f7a233abe815b4ec93aa8e9b82403294f (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/7/16 Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:beranger5ca@yahoo.ca">beranger5ca@yahoo.ca</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
>Well, LO is probably exception, AFAIK mostly due to its building troubles but<br>
<br>
>at least KDE has always had almost all alphas and betas and RCs in cooker/cauldron<br>
<br>
KDE is the main reason I'm using Cauldron.<br>
<br>
Since KDE 4.0.0, KDE is never "good/stable enough", so it _always_ makes sense<br>
to install all the RCs.<br>
<br>
(There are some DEs that are never "stable enough". Or, when they are really<br>
polished -- think KDE 3.5.10 or GNOME 2.32 --, there are some benevolent teams<br>
of dictators who decide to jump to an unstable boat -- thinl KDE 4.0.0, GNOME 3.0.)<br>
<br>
I've seen no betas here, only RCs (4.6.3 -> 4.6.4 -> 4.6.90 -> 4.6.95). Fair enough.<br>
<br></blockquote><div>Not in Mageia, yet... But Mandriva had e.g after 4.5.0 4.5.65, 4.5.67, 4.5.68. 4.5.71, 4.5.74 and so on - i.e. surely betas and IINM some alphas, too. So it surely is not so rare to have in development version as cooker/cauldron quite unstable versions.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><font color="#888888"><br>
R-C<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>
|
