summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110127/0f5a41fc/attachment.html
blob: e3ea3058a3159a34b4ea41c7ab3de0408cf23fe2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
<p><br>
Le 27 janv. 2011 14:29, &quot;Buchan Milne&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net">bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net</a>&gt; a écrit :<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On Monday, 24 January 2011 13:37:19 Jerome Quelin wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; hi,<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; some news regarding perl modules rebuilding...<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; i&#39;m going my way through the existing modules, rebuilding them in order.<br>
&gt; &gt; i&#39;ve already rebuild ~1700 of them - remains 600.<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; in the meantime, i&#39;ve blacklisted some of the rebuilds due to missing<br>
&gt; &gt; non-perl prereqs, build errors that i don&#39;t have the time to investigate<br>
&gt; &gt; (yet), etc. so it&#39;s a perfect opportunity for you to step in and help if<br>
&gt; &gt; you have some tuits to spare.<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; here&#39;s the list of blacklist, with respective problem:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; [...]<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; perl-Heimdal-Kadm5                          miss heimdal-devel<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Due to lack of time, I haven&#39;t been able to be involved in the packaging<br>
&gt; meetings up to now. However, now that I have fixed the most pressing issues in<br>
&gt; CatDap, I would like to get some of my Mandriva packages into Mageia.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; However, I haven&#39;t seen an authoritative indication of what software should go<br>
&gt; into which repository. If there is only to be one &#39;core&#39; repository, and all<br>
&gt; main+contrib should go there, then I will look at uploading heimdal (and<br>
&gt; various other packages) there.<br>
&gt;</p>
<p>here it is <br>
<a href="http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=mirrors_policy&amp;s[]=tainted">http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=mirrors_policy&amp;s[]=tainted</a></p>
<p>&gt; However, that brings up some other questions. Which Kerberos implementation<br>
&gt; are we going to use as the &quot;default&quot; ? Heimdal has some interesting features<br>
&gt; (I think especially of the kcm Kerberos credential manager, allowing multiple<br>
&gt; tickets, and a patch for Openssh to allow specification of which ticket to use<br>
&gt; for which hosts in ~/.ssh/config).</p>
<p>I guess you should make  proposals explaining reasons and roadmap </p>
<p>&gt;<br>
&gt; Regards,<br>
&gt; Buchan<br>
</p>