<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/2 Fabrice Facorat <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:fabrice.facorat@gmail.com">fabrice.facorat@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
2010/10/1 Sinner from the Prairy &lt;<a href="mailto:sinnerbofh@gmail.com">sinnerbofh@gmail.com</a>&gt;:<br>
<div class="im">&gt; Fabrice Facorat wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
&gt; But the ones they have: work great, are integrated with the rest of the<br>
&gt; ecosystem, are user-friendly and they are aesthetically pleasant.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; By focusing on 90% of specs and getting them to be 95% perfect, instead of<br>
&gt; having 100% of specs and getting them to be just 50% workable, regular<br>
&gt; people (95% of the population) like their products.<br>
<br>
</div>you&#39;re 100% right<br>
<div class="im"><br>
&gt; Apple&#39;s approach mimics the Unix philosophy (every small tool covers a task<br>
&gt; extremely well, and integrates with the rest of the Unix system): every<br>
&gt; single technical bullet point included does a task extremely well with the<br>
&gt; rest of the tools and look&#39;n&#39;feel.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Mandriva tries that, with look&#39;n&#39;feel consistent on MCC, KDE and Gnome.<br>
&gt; draketools work on TUI or GUI. They work well.<br>
<br>
</div>some tools does not work correctly however and are buggy<br><br></blockquote><div>�</div><div>Better� is to fix them instead of rewrite all.<br></div></div>