zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101001/c90d9d83/attachment.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

I think that from both a financial and technological point of view Mageia should have two releases a year.  With the rate at which Linux technology increases it makes a lot of sense to have a release every 6 months.  Also, I do agree that using the year number for each release is very handy.<br>
<br>-Jason A. Turner<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/1 Maurice Batey <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:maurice@bcs.org.uk">maurice@bcs.org.uk</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:51:34 +0300, atilla ontas wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; I&#39;m just wondering if we follow Mandriva&#39;s release cycle model. Every<br>
&gt; 6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should<br>
&gt; make one release in one year.<br>
<br>
</div>  I feel the same way, but from an income point of view Mageia would<br>
probably be better off with 2 per year.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
&gt;  Do we follow Mandriva&#39;s release naming scheme? I.e.<br>
&gt; do we call our first release 2011.x ?<br>
<br>
</div>  Incorporating  the year number is a big help.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
/\/\aurice<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><div style="visibility: hidden; display: inline;" id="avg_ls_inline_popup"></div><style type="text/css">#avg_ls_inline_popup {  position:absolute;  z-index:9999;  padding: 0px 0px;  margin-left: 0px;  margin-top: 0px;  width: 240px;  overflow: hidden;  word-wrap: break-word;  color: black;  font-size: 10px;  text-align: left;  line-height: 13px;}</style>