blob: 77affda720df0809c065d9c4b9d09703a56c8d0e (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Proposal for Gstreamer 1.0 packaging: tainted version should require the tainted specific plugins
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20Gstreamer%201.0%20packaging%3A%20tainted%0A%20version%20should%20require%20the%20tainted%20specific%20plugins&In-Reply-To=%3C51070741.2030006%40hiebel.eu%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="022153.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="022171.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Gstreamer 1.0 packaging: tainted version should require the tainted specific plugins</H1>
<B>Manuel Hiebel</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20Gstreamer%201.0%20packaging%3A%20tainted%0A%20version%20should%20require%20the%20tainted%20specific%20plugins&In-Reply-To=%3C51070741.2030006%40hiebel.eu%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Gstreamer 1.0 packaging: tainted version should require the tainted specific plugins">manuel.mageia at hiebel.eu
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Jan 29 00:18:25 CET 2013</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="022153.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Gstreamer 1.0 packaging: tainted version should require the tainted specific plugins
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="022171.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Gstreamer 1.0 packaging: tainted version should require the tainted specific plugins
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#22159">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#22159">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#22159">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#22159">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 28/01/2013 22:57, Olav Vitters a écrit :
><i> To allow Totem to play back any file, in practice you want to install
</I>><i> GStreamer 1.0 from the tainted section.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Ideally to play back a lot of files, you'll want:
</I>><i> gstreamer1.0-dts
</I>><i> gstreamer1.0-faad
</I>><i> gstreamer1.0-x264
</I>><i> gstreamer1.0-amrwbdec
</I>><i>
</I>><i> However, I cannot rely on those in totem.spec, because they are in the
</I>><i> tainted section.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I see two ways of solving this:
</I>><i> 1. Building a non-tainted and a tainted totem
</I>><i> The tainted one has Requires: for the tainted gstreamer 1.0 packages
</I>><i> you'll very likely want.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Benefit:
</I>><i> - Avoids Gstreamer 1.0 plugin packages from depending on lots of
</I>><i> other packages
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Drawback:
</I>><i> - Has to be repeated for every video player that uses GStreamer
</I>><i> - Tracking subpackages can be difficult
</I>><i> - Totem tainted version has a lot more dependencies
</I>><i>
</I>><i> 2. Ensure that installing the tainted gstreamer1.0 plugin packages
</I>><i> installs all related tainted plugin packages
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Example:
</I>><i> gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad package in tainted should have:
</I>><i> Requires: gstreamer1.0-dts
</I>><i> Requires: gstreamer1.0-faad
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Due to subpackages possibly being moved in and out of the tainted
</I>><i> section, the only thing I want to change is the Requires. I'm not
</I>><i> planning to merge the subpackage.. even if it maybe is a little bit
</I>><i> weird to have the main package always require the subpackage.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Benefit:
</I>><i> - Ensures that enabling tainted section makes video playing 'work'
</I>><i> in any player that uses GStreamer
</I>><i> - List of subpackages is maintained in just one place
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Drawback:
</I>><i> - Increases the size + dependencies of the tainted gstreamer
</I>><i> subpackage
</I>><i> - Cannot just install just one tainted subpackage, have to install
</I>><i> them all at once
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I think #2 is the best option. If someone enables tainted, then likely
</I>><i> they just want video playing to work. Furthermore, this avoids changing
</I>><i> all the video players which could use GStreamer.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Thoughts?
</I>><i>
</I>
It should not be automatically with packagekit ?
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="022153.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Gstreamer 1.0 packaging: tainted version should require the tainted specific plugins
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="022171.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Gstreamer 1.0 packaging: tainted version should require the tainted specific plugins
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#22159">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#22159">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#22159">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#22159">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
