1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Ruby 1.9 landing soon
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Ruby%201.9%20landing%20soon&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOfq2QTcaWE4Xtq4jFx_D9tkb%2BKewfEhOq6ES41x7eHEhWyn_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="018549.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="018743.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Ruby 1.9 landing soon</H1>
<B>Funda Wang</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Ruby%201.9%20landing%20soon&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOfq2QTcaWE4Xtq4jFx_D9tkb%2BKewfEhOq6ES41x7eHEhWyn_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Ruby 1.9 landing soon">fundawang at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Sep 13 05:17:56 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018549.html">[Mageia-dev] Ruby 1.9 landing soon
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018743.html">[Mageia-dev] Ruby 1.9 landing soon
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18646">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18646">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18646">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18646">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>After some test, here is the proposal for ruby 1.9:
* arch-dependent .so files will be put into %{ruby_archdir}
(%{_libdir}/ruby). No version prefix or suffix, as we are only
providing one flavor of ruby.
* arch-independent .rb files will be put into %{ruby_libdir} (%{_datadir}/ruby)
* ruby only produces ruby, libruby, ruby-devel and ruby-doc sub
packages, rubygems will be deleted from main package, to be singled
out.
If there is no any negative opinion, I'll be pushing it into
core/release in a few days.
2012/9/8 Thierry Vignaud <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">thierry.vignaud at gmail.com</A>>:
><i> On 8 September 2012 02:26, Funda Wang <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">fundawang at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>>><i> Hello,
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> As ruby 1.8 will be dead soon upstream, I'll push ruby 1.9 soon
</I>>><i> directly to core/release. The plan is, for those modules which cannot
</I>>><i> be built or run with ruby 1.9, or dead upstream, it should be dropped.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> WDYTH?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Looks good.
</I></PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018549.html">[Mageia-dev] Ruby 1.9 landing soon
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018743.html">[Mageia-dev] Ruby 1.9 landing soon
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18646">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18646">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18646">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18646">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
