1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bsoft-commits%5D%20%5B5642%5D%20skip%20packages%20with%20no%20name&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2Bbja5sCrZBEeCbroGUHbPwn_EbepPK0s19vzgpM2s4pX6Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="018472.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="018454.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name</H1>
<B>Pascal Terjan</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bsoft-commits%5D%20%5B5642%5D%20skip%20packages%20with%20no%20name&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2Bbja5sCrZBEeCbroGUHbPwn_EbepPK0s19vzgpM2s4pX6Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name">pterjan at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Sep 5 13:27:38 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018472.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018454.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18475">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18475">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18475">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18475">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Romain d'Alverny <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">rdalverny at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
><i> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Colin Guthrie <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">mageia at colin.guthr.ie</A>> wrote:
</I>>><i> 'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
</I>>>><i> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">rdalverny at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>>><i> By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build
</I>>>>><i> duration (15588 days; always the same value when it occurs). I didn't
</I>>>>><i> investigate yet.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> So 15588 would be days since epoch. I guess it's the same as Pascal's
</I>>><i> comment. If it was submitted over 2 days ago we might not read the
</I>>><i> submit time and it ends up getting a timestamp of 0 and thus 15588 days
</I>>><i> to build.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Ok. So at this point (where we do a find to get the files), what's the
</I>><i> good approach: just leave the package/build out of the list if we
</I>><i> can't get its name (that's the new behaviour in my pending new index
</I>><i> page) or fix the find to get all? I'd say the former.
</I>
Yes that's fine
><i> Two others things that are aside this very point:
</I>><i>
</I>><i> * we could gain more insight over the whole submission/build process
</I>><i> if we could store data about way past builds (not necessarily the full
</I>><i> details of each build, at least not right now, but at least the
</I>><i> basics: when, who, what package, how long it took on which host, what
</I>><i> was the result). One way to do it would be to have a database in which
</I>><i> we can push and update info about each submission, as it happens
</I>><i> (today, everything is only in the filesystem). What control points
</I>><i> would need to be modified to push information into such a database?
</I>
Ulri would probably be enough expect for upload, so maybe ulri + emi
But then it would be better to instead use that as reference in
ulri/emi instead of looking through the filesystem :)
><i> * today, submissions are shown simply by src package. Should we show
</I>><i> submission results per arch? (what if i586 passes and x86_64 fails for
</I>><i> instance).
</I>
It can not happen unless there is a bug, they are submitted together
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018472.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018454.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18475">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18475">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18475">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18475">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
