blob: 1d397c8af1caa478e0babdef0804fdded03cadb3 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3Calpine.LMD.2.02.1210300116280.18343%40zem.cjw.nep%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="019648.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="019634.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue</H1>
<B>Christiaan Welvaart</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3Calpine.LMD.2.02.1210300116280.18343%40zem.cjw.nep%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue">cjw at daneel.dyndns.org
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Oct 30 01:32:22 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019648.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019634.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#19630">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#19630">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#19630">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#19630">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
><i> Nice to see that everyone went back to Start with this discussion,
</I>><i> almost using the same words in their arguments. Is this really needed?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> There has been a wide consensus for the solution to put it into
</I>><i> tainted as has been said in this thread as well. There are 2 options
</I>
Each package in non-free must be inspected case-by-case to know if it can
be distributed/used, but their licenses are valid world-wide (because
copyright is pretty much universally accepted). The packages in tainted
can all be used/distributed *if* patents on software are not considered
valid in the country where the user/mirror resides. Do you really want to
mix those two?
Christiaan
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019648.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019634.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#19630">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#19630">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#19630">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#19630">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
