blob: 51f08986c7176493b89f356462eb225d9308e2ae (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3Cm3390w2551.fsf%40euphor.blino.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="019627.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="019632.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue</H1>
<B>Olivier Blin</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3Cm3390w2551.fsf%40euphor.blino.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue">mageia at blino.org
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Oct 30 01:08:26 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019627.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019632.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#19628">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#19628">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#19628">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#19628">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Wolfgang Bornath <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>> writes:
><i> There has been a wide consensus for the solution to put it into
</I>><i> tainted as has been said in this thread as well.
</I>
The consensus was maybe not so clear then.
><i> Sorry if it is too offending for one or the other if I call this
</I>><i> procedure "ridiculous".
</I>
Where do you see a procedure here? :-)
Offer one if you think that's needed.
It could be up to the council or board to chose the lesser evil between:
- picking tainted for non-free + tainted packages like faac, and thus
forbid mirroring tainted packages that are only free-software
(but maybe that's the hypothetical 'selective mirror admin' from Guillaume)
- adding a new nonfree-tainted repository, just for faac for now,
despite the relative media clutter that it would add, but for the sake
of clear definitions of the media content
--
Olivier Blin - blino
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019627.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019632.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#19628">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#19628">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#19628">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#19628">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|