summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019204.html
blob: 5639d74a4d52011ffdc629b9a3d5f00096661293 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj5_37XW1Y40go%3De6c3mWv%2BsfXsH9XbK%2B-zPc8GZTFOTcg%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="019203.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="019205.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue</H1>
    <B>Wolfgang Bornath</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj5_37XW1Y40go%3De6c3mWv%2BsfXsH9XbK%2B-zPc8GZTFOTcg%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue">molch.b at googlemail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Thu Oct  4 18:22:37 CEST 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019203.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019205.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#19204">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#19204">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#19204">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#19204">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>2012/10/4 Frank Griffin &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">ftg at roadrunner.com</A>&gt;:
&gt;<i> On 10/04/2012 11:29 AM, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Still the trust on a software filter is not the same as the trust in a
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> visible separation. If you think there is no technical difference, this
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> discussion is not just on technical of the issue. If I go into an empty room
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> which is dark, everybody could tell me that the room is empty and I can't
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> hurt myself by falling over some furniture - still I'd prefer the lights on.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> You're correct, and one of the points I'm trying to make is that while it is
</I>&gt;<i> reasonable to technically enable FOSS enthusiasts to install a FOSS-only
</I>&gt;<i> system easily, it is not reasonable to make things difficult for everyone
</I>&gt;<i> else simply to pander to FOSS political correctness.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> The same argument underlies the issue of an install process that caters to
</I>&gt;<i> both free and nonfree via a switch versus one that allows no nonfree
</I>&gt;<i> software on the install media or no nonfree repo to be considered by the
</I>&gt;<i> installer.  In  both cases, a FOSS enthusiast can have what he wants, but
</I>&gt;<i> I'm sure the enthusiast would be happier with the latter case, for all the
</I>&gt;<i> non-technical reasons you mention, including that it makes it more difficult
</I>&gt;<i> for others to do things of which he disapproves.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> If there's no technical difference between two approaches, we ought to pick
</I>&gt;<i> the one that works best for the greatest part of the user base.
</I>
Yes, that's why I prefer the separation of free and non-free repos.
IMHO opinion it is easier to have non-free visually out of the way for
the FOSS enthousiasts and it's just one click (actually 2 including
non-free/updates) for the users who want it all.

Furthermore there is another reason to keep the repos separated: it is
Mageias written intention to support and advocate FOSS. Separating
non-free and FOSS is a visible demonstration of this intention. Mixing
both in the same repo is the opposite.

-- 
wobo
</PRE>










<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019203.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019205.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#19204">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#19204">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#19204">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#19204">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>