blob: b2c951da914c82b93a788be1b254eea2f86dce80 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj7KiHsn4tQsQyabRfdKjZWK410DkqfaWPYYs4Sdf8UTOg%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="019124.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="019127.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue</H1>
<B>Wolfgang Bornath</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj7KiHsn4tQsQyabRfdKjZWK410DkqfaWPYYs4Sdf8UTOg%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue">molch.b at googlemail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Oct 2 14:58:03 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019124.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019127.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#19125">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#19125">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#19125">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#19125">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>2012/10/2 James Kerr <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">jim at jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk</A>>:
><i> On 02/10/2012 12:26, Frank Griffin wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> At least for my part, I always viewed tainted as being the equivalent of
</I>>><i> PLF,
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> PLF had both free and non-free repo's.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> If you include both free and non-free in tainted, which is probably the
</I>><i> "least bad" solution, then there needs to be a way for FOSS enthusiasts (who
</I>><i> choose to do so) to avoid the non-free packages - perhaps a statement in the
</I>><i> package description would suffice.
</I>
Well, are you saying that tainted includes free packages although they
are subject to a patent? 'cause that's the only reason I could think
of a FOSS enthousiast would like them to be separated from the
non-free packages in "tainted". Or the other way 'round.
IMHO a package is "not free" anyway as soon as it qualifies for
"tainted" - whatever reason.
That's why I call the distinction "beaurocratic" and the discussion "academic"
--
wobo
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019124.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019127.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#19125">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#19125">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#19125">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#19125">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|