summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019736.html
blob: 4abac9f0d4c166c3587bcd4235a2e803fa3de5b9 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista (war Re: rehashing the faac issue)
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista%20%28war%20Re%3A%20rehashing%0A%20the%20faac%20issue%29&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOPHaVQnM-2A-9_O7AU3mvU0%2BC4xXD82qxo5oQaj03tbcZFNFg%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="019734.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="019721.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista (war Re: rehashing the faac issue)</H1>
    <B>Christian Lohmaier</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista%20%28war%20Re%3A%20rehashing%0A%20the%20faac%20issue%29&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOPHaVQnM-2A-9_O7AU3mvU0%2BC4xXD82qxo5oQaj03tbcZFNFg%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista (war Re: rehashing the faac issue)">lohmaier+mageia at googlemail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Fri Nov  2 00:56:41 CET 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019734.html">[Mageia-dev] cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista (war Re: rehashing	the faac issue)
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019721.html">[Mageia-dev] cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista (war Re: rehashing the faac issue)
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#19736">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#19736">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#19736">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#19736">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hi Olivier, *,

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Olivier Blin &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">mageia at blino.org</A>&gt; wrote:
&gt;<i> Christian Lohmaier &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">lohmaier+mageia at googlemail.com</A>&gt; writes:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Wolfgang Bornath &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>&gt; wrote:
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> [...]
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> After reading all arguments again I must confess that I changed my
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> opinion: Being consequent and following our road we need a
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> /tainted-free and a /tainted-nonfree branch.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I still think this would be a very user-*un*friendly way to handle it.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> [...]
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Much better would then be to create an &quot;ugly&quot; repo (in the spirit of
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> gstreamer) that contains the &quot;doesn't fit into the other repos&quot; stuff.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> That's just a naming issue then, are you just suggesting to rename the
</I>&gt;<i> &quot;tainted-nonfree&quot; repository proposal as &quot;ugly&quot;?
</I>
No - my point was that I think a split of tainted into tainted-free
and tainted-nonfree is pointless and not user-friendly.
I only want one repository for the &quot;problematic&quot; stuff.

Not naming it &quot;tainted&quot; is just because what ends up there is not only
stuff that really is tainted, but also packages that just depend on
tainted ones.

&gt;<i> If we go for the &quot;tainted + nonfree&quot; way, its definition should be that
</I>&gt;<i> it contains packages that:
</I>&gt;<i> (1) are both tainted and not free software
</I>&gt;<i> or
</I>&gt;<i> (2) packages having a hard requirement on packages from (1)
</I>
See - and that from my POV is pointless. so the tainted+nonfree
contains a happy mixture of tainted and non-tainted, all variants of
free to tainted-nonfree.

I just don't see the point in splitting &quot;tainted&quot; repo that way (other
than that bureaucratic thing that I as a user think is superfluous)

ciao
Christian
</PRE>





<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019734.html">[Mageia-dev] cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista (war Re: rehashing	the faac issue)
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019721.html">[Mageia-dev] cinelerra/audiokonverter/arista (war Re: rehashing the faac issue)
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#19736">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#19736">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#19736">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#19736">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>