blob: 8ecfb1f58b3e0765b0ecfeda9afe1327ad3c99ec (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Pyro update
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Pyro%20update&In-Reply-To=%3C4FC4C793.8020407%40googlemail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="015923.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="015925.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Pyro update</H1>
<B>Oliver Burger</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Pyro%20update&In-Reply-To=%3C4FC4C793.8020407%40googlemail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Pyro update">oliver.bgr at googlemail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Tue May 29 14:56:51 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015923.html">[Mageia-dev] Mageia 2 post-mortem
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="015925.html">[Mageia-dev] Pyro update
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#15924">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#15924">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#15924">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#15924">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hi there,
I notice we have pyro 3.10 in the repositories. By now, according to the
projects homepage at <A HREF="http://packages.python.org/Pyro4/intro.html">http://packages.python.org/Pyro4/intro.html</A> pyro
4.x (which is a reimplementation) can be considered as the main branch
of the project.
So what to do? Both versions of pyro are not api compatible, so just
updating pyro 3.x to pyro 4.x might crush someone's applications.
So should we import pyro 4.x as a versioned package and keep pyro 3.x as
it is or should we rename pyro 3.x to pyro3 and import pyro 4.x as pyro?
I would prefer the first way, since upstream choose to call the newer
version pyro4 instead of pyro.
Oliver
--
Oliver Burger aka obgr_seneca
Mageia contributor
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015923.html">[Mageia-dev] Mageia 2 post-mortem
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="015925.html">[Mageia-dev] Pyro update
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#15924">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#15924">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#15924">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#15924">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
