zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013276.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20lighttpd%20and%20others%20now%20require%20apache&In-Reply-To=%3C4F68B4C6.3060509%40gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="013185.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="013345.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache</H1>
    <B>Guillaume Rousse</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20lighttpd%20and%20others%20now%20require%20apache&In-Reply-To=%3C4F68B4C6.3060509%40gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache">guillomovitch at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Mar 20 17:48:06 CET 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013185.html">[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="013345.html">[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#13276">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#13276">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#13276">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#13276">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 17/03/2012 03:22, Anssi Hannula a &#233;crit :
&gt;<i> Hence I suggest a single user id to be used. (I'm fine with any other
</I>&gt;<i> solution which works as well)
</I>My main concern is the fuzziness of the current situation where we have
- one virtual package 'webserver' corresponding to four implementations 
(apache, lightpd, nginx, cherooke)
- one common base (webserver-base) only used by the two first ones
- all our web applications packages using 'apache' as mandatory dependency

If the main concern is file ownership, I'd propose for the next release 
to have each of these servers use a distinct uid, document root and 
index page, but use a shared 'webserver' or 'www' gid, and ensure all of 
those applications use group-based permission, instead of user-based. 
I'd find this setup a bit clearer.

-- 
BOFH excuse #339:

manager in the cable duct
</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013185.html">[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="013345.html">[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#13276">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#13276">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#13276">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#13276">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>