1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BFreeze%5D%20please%20let%20in%20xonotic&In-Reply-To=%3C4F5E302B.1040807%40mageia.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="012943.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="012993.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic</H1>
<B>Anssi Hannula</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BFreeze%5D%20please%20let%20in%20xonotic&In-Reply-To=%3C4F5E302B.1040807%40mageia.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic">anssi at mageia.org
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Mar 12 18:19:39 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="012943.html">[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="012993.html">[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#12987">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#12987">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#12987">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#12987">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>11.03.2012 19:28, Colin Guthrie kirjoitti:
><i> However, I do feel we need to be more generally open to freeze pushes.
</I>><i> The justification in this case, IMO, was sufficient and in line with the
</I>><i> previous interpretations of policy we have expected in the past, but I
</I>><i> completely respect misc if he still disagrees.
</I>
I also believe we should be more open to pushes for packages like
xonotic, i.e. "unimportant" leaf packages, since having the new version
for software like xonotic is generally more important than having zero
regressions (which are in any case limited to xonotic only, and can be
fixed later).
Line would have to be drawn somewhere, though (otherwise it would become
a mess, I guess), and I'm really not sure right now where it should
exactly be then....
This is just my opinion, not based on any previous discussion.
--
Anssi Hannula
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="012943.html">[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="012993.html">[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#12987">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#12987">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#12987">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#12987">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
