1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Gtk+3.0 bindings API break, what to do?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Gtk%2B3.0%20bindings%20API%20break%2C%20what%20to%20do%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCAONrEtZfTBBw%3DY8921xCc5Cet1OKi5P0bHWZ5gVWLwpHhBD5Qw%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="012706.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="012752.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Gtk+3.0 bindings API break, what to do?</H1>
<B>Thierry Vignaud</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Gtk%2B3.0%20bindings%20API%20break%2C%20what%20to%20do%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCAONrEtZfTBBw%3DY8921xCc5Cet1OKi5P0bHWZ5gVWLwpHhBD5Qw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Gtk+3.0 bindings API break, what to do?">thierry.vignaud at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Mar 6 21:36:30 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="012706.html">[Mageia-dev] Gtk+3.0 bindings API break, what to do?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="012752.html">[Mageia-dev] Gtk+3.0 bindings API break, what to do?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#12707">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#12707">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#12707">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#12707">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 6 March 2012 21:30, Colin Guthrie <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">mageia at colin.guthr.ie</A>> wrote:
>><i> As per <A HREF="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657385">https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657385</A>
</I>>><i> gtk_menu_popup_for_device() has been renamed to gtk_menu_popup() in
</I>>><i> introspection, causing at least Menu.popup() in python-gi to break.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Ubuntu has reverted it:
</I>>><i> <A HREF="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/923171">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/923171</A>
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Attached are alternative one-liner patches to either revert the API
</I>>><i> break in Gtk+3.0 (dont_rename_annotation.patch, from Ubuntu), or to
</I>>><i> adapt python-gobject3 to the API change
</I>>><i> (python-gi-adapt-for-gnome657385.patch, written by me).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> My gut feeling would be that your patch is the better and more upstream
</I>><i> compatible direction here.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I suspect if the Ubuntu approach is used, we'll also have to fix Vala
</I>><i> stuff in the future too (which will very likely follow the upstream
</I>><i> direction). Don't know what else would use the introspection stuff.
</I>
Other languages binding
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="012706.html">[Mageia-dev] Gtk+3.0 bindings API break, what to do?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="012752.html">[Mageia-dev] Gtk+3.0 bindings API break, what to do?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#12707">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#12707">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#12707">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#12707">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
