1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C4FEC14C6.1000000%40linux.it%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016955.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016916.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary</H1>
<B>Angelo Naselli</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C4FEC14C6.1000000%40linux.it%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary">anaselli at linux.it
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Jun 28 10:24:38 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016955.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016916.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16961">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16961">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16961">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16961">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 28/06/2012 04:00, Johnny A. Solbu ha scritto:
><i> No, it is Not obvious. It is called Backports for a reason. It is
</I>><i> software that is not part of the release, and is to be treated as
</I>><i> experimental/beta software, as it could wery well break your system
</I>><i> if you don't know what you are doing.
</I>This is *not* obvious as well. It's not written anywhere that should be
experimental, with beta/alpha programs....
A backport is just something that is not part of the release, yes,
but also that should not be get through update.
There's no reasons to talk about backports in fedora probably,
since all goes to update for the most, our policy says (or will do)
what can (and what can't) go to backports.
Said that, backports have been approved last night meeting,
let's talk about bp subject again in case of problems (that of course
we won't have since we're very good at :D )
Cheers,
Angelo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <A HREF="http://enigmail.mozdev.org/">http://enigmail.mozdev.org/</A>
iEYEARECAAYFAk/sFMYACgkQqEs9DA4DquBjQQCdEc0gSDF5eRvSVQ8iV1U8RnA/
BFAAn1IaPt75SVVCcNarlHYEK0t9EU63
=0vqO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016955.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016916.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16961">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16961">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16961">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16961">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
