blob: 230936ce9b46105a98ccb5304228607ff8bf3d79 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%09like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3Cjs52tq%2459h%241%40dough.gmane.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016768.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016701.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media</H1>
<B>David Walser</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%09like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3Cjs52tq%2459h%241%40dough.gmane.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media">luigiwalser at yahoo.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Jun 23 20:46:08 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016768.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016701.html">[Mageia-dev] lemonldap-ng
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16783">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16783">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16783">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16783">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>andre999 wrote:
><i> For backports, there is the understanding that in addition to being
</I>><i> tested by QA (after initial packager and end-user tests), that the
</I>><i> packager would commit to providing security updates as necessary. This
</I>><i> is much more than "no support at all", as happened with mdv backports.
</I>
I hope this point is clear to everyone before we open backports. As most of you probably know, I keep a watchful eye on security updates and
file bugs and build some updates for things that need security fixes in Cauldron and the released, supported versions of Mageia. This takes a
lot of time, and I have no intention of adding backports to the list of versions I track. If you backport a package, *you* are responsible for
monitoring that package for any needed security updates and providing them as necessary.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016768.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016701.html">[Mageia-dev] lemonldap-ng
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16783">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16783">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16783">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16783">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
