blob: c5dfd1918de643a4116445514aff5efeb823cce9 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%09like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3C1420079.ET9iyQyBG3%40localhost%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016713.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016709.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media</H1>
<B>AL13N</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%09like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3C1420079.ET9iyQyBG3%40localhost%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media">alien at rmail.be
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Jun 21 19:41:29 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016713.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016709.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16715">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16715">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16715">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16715">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op donderdag 21 juni 2012 20:39:33 schreef Sander Lepik:
><i> 21.06.2012 18:36, Thierry Vignaud kirjutas:
</I>><i> >> if everyone is cherry picking backports, there's no use to having
</I>><i> >> supported backports, and thus we should just have unsupported backports.
</I>><i> >> it'll make all of this alot easier.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Indeed. As we always did.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> QA is needed for backports, but only at that level that it's possible to
</I>><i> install the package and basic functionality works. After that QA should not
</I>><i> worry about it no more. Then you are on your own. AFAIK at Mandriva
</I>><i> backports didn't pass even that step, they were just pushed into backports
</I>><i> and that's it.
</I>
yes, but that's exactly the step that's problematic. (installing the package)
i'm not even talking about have the application start, just installing.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016713.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016709.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16715">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16715">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16715">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16715">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|