blob: 22ccc222ba952e0d5a69634186d995c393ee7a16 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20packaging%20amrwb%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4FE1BEE0.4020608%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016677.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016681.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?</H1>
<B>Claire Robinson</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20packaging%20amrwb%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4FE1BEE0.4020608%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?">eeeemail at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Jun 20 14:15:28 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016677.html">[Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016681.html">[Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16679">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16679">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16679">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16679">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 20/06/12 13:05, Oliver Burger wrote:
><i> Am 20.06.2012 13:45, schrieb Simple w:
</I>>><i> Appears to be different from faac case, because this one doesnt have a
</I>>><i> GPL license, so it could be in non-free repository.
</I>><i> The issue with faac is not, that it's partly GPL, the problem is, it's
</I>><i> partly nonfree.
</I>><i> Packages that are _pure_ OpenSource and patented are going into tainted.
</I>><i> Packages that are non-free and not patented are going into nonfree.
</I>><i> But this is nonfree and patented, unless someeone can prove me and
</I>><i> wikipedia wrong.
</I>><i> So it's a no-go.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Oliver
</I>><i>
</I>
I don't want to add fuel to the fire but just out of interest, why is it
that we don't allow nonfree-tainted in Tainted?
I understand that open source purists may not want it but are we
catering to a minority and ignoring a majority?
Claire
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016677.html">[Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016681.html">[Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16679">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16679">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16679">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16679">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|