blob: 2bb26c45012deda6f6577bd4afeb47dbe899b151 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Skype 4.0 for Linux - Package request
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Skype%204.0%20for%20Linux%20-%20Package%20request&In-Reply-To=%3C4FDB7AF8.4090405%40linux.it%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016545.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016530.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Skype 4.0 for Linux - Package request</H1>
<B>Angelo Naselli</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Skype%204.0%20for%20Linux%20-%20Package%20request&In-Reply-To=%3C4FDB7AF8.4090405%40linux.it%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Skype 4.0 for Linux - Package request">anaselli at linux.it
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Jun 15 20:12:08 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016545.html">[Mageia-dev] Skype 4.0 for Linux - Package request
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016530.html">[Mageia-dev] Skype 4.0 for Linux - Package request
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16546">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16546">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16546">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16546">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 15/06/2012 19:56, Sander Lepik ha scritto:
><i> 15.06.2012 20:43, Claire Robinson kirjutas:
</I>>><i> Shouldn't this be a normal update to get-skype rather than a
</I>>><i> backport?
</I>
That's why i said what maintainer and our policy can do :D
><i> So long there is no reason to do that. 2.0.0.35 is still available
</I>><i> and has no know secuirty issues.
</I>But it's also a proprietary sofware in which we are not always able to
know that...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <A HREF="http://enigmail.mozdev.org/">http://enigmail.mozdev.org/</A>
iEYEARECAAYFAk/bevgACgkQqEs9DA4DquAd/gCfT7Y5FjbscrCbGIxEb/Wa9Tw0
df8An2ZBuCoOGJB20c4kxOvOfRNvLiti
=dQKz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016545.html">[Mageia-dev] Skype 4.0 for Linux - Package request
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016530.html">[Mageia-dev] Skype 4.0 for Linux - Package request
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16546">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16546">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16546">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16546">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|