blob: 565e22ec50c364080271fc59e62f386670901243 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C9cfba9-eei.ln1%40psd.motzarella.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016314.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016311.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)</H1>
<B>blind Pete</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C9cfba9-eei.ln1%40psd.motzarella.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)">0123peter at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Jun 9 10:50:49 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016314.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016311.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16317">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16317">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16317">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16317">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Sander Lepik wrote:
><i> 09.06.2012 10:06, blind Pete kirjutas:
</I>>><i> andre999 wrote:
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> [snip]
</I>>>><i> I see your point.
</I>>>><i> In most cases, a backport for mga1 would be essentially identical for
</I>>>><i> mga2 (except package file name and corresponding changes in the spec
</I>>>><i> file). It would only differ if dependancies differ, which I suspect is
</I>>>><i> unlikely for wesnoth or most other games, for example.
</I>>>><i> So this means that for a backport to mga1, we should first do one to
</I>>>><i> mga2.
</I>>><i> [snip]
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> No. Cauldron then mga2 then mga1.
</I>>><i>
</I>><i> Well, you can't do backport for mga2 if you don't have new version in
</I>><i> cauldron ;)
</I>
Just trying to be complete. This is the sort of situation where
incompleteness becomes ambiguity which becomes a bug.
--
blind Pete
Sig goes here...
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016314.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016311.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16317">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16317">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16317">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16317">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
