blob: 67ac6bbcd336110f943ed4575794bc34d1fd0620 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C1545923.dVDAW9Gf3t%40localhost%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016300.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016312.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)</H1>
<B>AL13N</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C1545923.dVDAW9Gf3t%40localhost%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)">alien at rmail.be
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Jun 8 21:05:41 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016300.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016312.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16301">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16301">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16301">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16301">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 20:40:04 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
><i> Le vendredi 8 juin 2012 16:58:24, andre999 a écrit :
</I>[...]
><i> > But wouldn't current tools update backports if backports are active ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> No, they wouldn't :)
</I>
but isn't this a bug? just like nonfree/tainted... etc...
code to detect what you had and use it for next upgrade, would be good. but
that would not be easy, unless we just keep it simple and fallback if people
don't have a standard layout.
In any case,
Stormi: what is your suggestion to change in the backport policy? or do you
think we can keep it, but we'd need alot more effort for some "features"?
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016300.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016312.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16301">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16301">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16301">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16301">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
