blob: 2c6f82dd4b0cbc68e6d323cb9ebfeb877a6c273b (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201206081957.45687.stormi%40laposte.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016290.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016291.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)</H1>
<B>Samuel Verschelde</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201206081957.45687.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)">stormi at laposte.net
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Jun 8 19:57:45 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016290.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016291.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16296">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16296">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16296">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16296">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le vendredi 8 juin 2012 16:45:28, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
><i> venerdì 8 giugno 2012 alle 16:22, Samuel Verschelde ha scritto:
</I>><i> > I think you missed my point. If Mageia 1 "backports" has higher versions
</I>><i> > than Mageia 2 "release" (not backports), upgrade can fail because
</I>><i> > currently our tools do not take backports from the target release
</I>><i> > (mageia 2) into account when upgrading a distro.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> And i think a mga N-1 bp should have mga N bp as well in that case or
</I>><i> should follow the same rules as between cauldron and updates e.g 1.1mgaN-1
</I>><i> means 2mgaN. Who backports will care, some more work does not mean we
</I>><i> can't have backports, just that we do really want that backport :)
</I>><i>
</I>><i> What we need is, however, being sure no one submits a package to bp_testing
</I>><i> (as well as to update_testing) without asking to package maintaner or
</I>><i> adding a bug report to manage that update/backport. I say that because it
</I>><i> happened for updates. I think it should be clear that QA won't test a
</I>><i> package only because it is in XX_testing repository and that maintainer
</I>><i> does not have to go and see on testing to know that someone has already
</I>><i> done the work, maybe after having done some work on it... am i wrong?
</I>><i>
</I>
Yes, it is already clear in the policy as it is written, in my opinion.
Samuel
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016290.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016291.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16296">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16296">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16296">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16296">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
