blob: 7f385aa05dd307dfd93cf66052bb85c7a12c548b (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201206081333.09771.stormi%40laposte.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016283.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016294.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)</H1>
<B>Samuel Verschelde</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201206081333.09771.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)">stormi at laposte.net
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Jun 8 13:33:09 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016283.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016294.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16279">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16279">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16279">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16279">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le vendredi 8 juin 2012 11:40:59, Sander Lepik a écrit :
><i> 08.06.2012 11:51, Samuel Verschelde kirjutas:
</I>><i> > And what about security issues and bugs to those backports? It will use
</I>><i> > more packager ressource to patch backports than to provide newer
</I>><i> > versions, won't it?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> If there is security issue then you have to fix it on cauldron too (usually
</I>><i> with new version, so you can backport it to stable version). At least
</I>><i> before release. And after backports are closed you can upgrade to latest
</I>><i> stable version (for example mga3) and get patched version this way. I
</I>><i> don't see the problem here.
</I>><i>
</I>
So you mean that backports are supported for 9 months and then you have to
upgrade to the next Mageia if you want security fixes... That's not what I call
support :/ What about people who want not to upgrade their whole system to the
next Mageia and still get support for that backport they installed?
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016283.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016294.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16279">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16279">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16279">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16279">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
