blob: 5b94d9e21fdb4173971a924807002d4fb8cb20ac (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4FD1C8AB.6040602%40eesti.ee%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016268.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016278.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)</H1>
<B>Sander Lepik</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4FD1C8AB.6040602%40eesti.ee%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)">sander.lepik at eesti.ee
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Jun 8 11:40:59 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016268.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016278.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16271">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16271">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16271">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16271">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>08.06.2012 11:51, Samuel Verschelde kirjutas:
><i> And what about security issues and bugs to those backports? It will use more
</I>><i> packager ressource to patch backports than to provide newer versions, won't
</I>><i> it?
</I>If there is security issue then you have to fix it on cauldron too (usually with new
version, so you can backport it to stable version). At least before release. And after
backports are closed you can upgrade to latest stable version (for example mga3) and get
patched version this way. I don't see the problem here.
--
Sander
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016268.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016278.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16271">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16271">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16271">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16271">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|