1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%2C%20omission%20or%20feature&In-Reply-To=%3C1674631.zYnbMetx8L%40localhost%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016095.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016097.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature</H1>
<B>AL13N</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%2C%20omission%20or%20feature&In-Reply-To=%3C1674631.zYnbMetx8L%40localhost%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature">alien at rmail.be
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Jun 3 14:56:30 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016095.html">[Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016097.html">[Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16096">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16096">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16096">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16096">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op zondag 3 juni 2012 14:04:07 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
><i> 2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">jani.valimaa at gmail.com</A>>:
</I>><i> > On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
</I>><i> >> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
</I>><i> >> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
</I>><i> >> the point?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > New and unique subject isn't always enough. There's still some headers
</I>><i> > from message which you presumably used with Reply button to get mailing
</I>><i> > list address and then erased the message box.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > To: Mageia development mailing-list <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">mageia-dev at mageia.org</A>>
</I>><i> > References: <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">4FCB1DA9.1070308 at gmail.com</A>>
</I>><i> > In-Reply-To: <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">4FCB1DA9.1070308 at gmail.com</A>>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Well, normally I do not look at the extended header. In my mailer the
</I>><i> message by Richard came in as new message, not within an older thread.
</I>><i> That's why I also replied that I do not see any hijacked Thread.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Looking at the references show 2 references but i never received the
</I>><i> mails with these references.
</I>[...]
it's Anne's mail with subject: [Mageia-dev] Mageia 2 and Cauldron updated with
proper design
also, OP, we like that in mailing list, no top posting is going on. iow: if
you reply, put your reply under the quoted part. for regular messages
topposting is fine, but in mailing lists it reads alot better.
tia
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016095.html">[Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016097.html">[Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16096">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16096">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16096">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16096">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
