summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011379.html
blob: 2e502702961a56c7cf99cb1bfa349e9c22c4ec3e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR &lt;= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20FireFox%20ESR%20%3C%3D%20we%20should%20totally%20go%20for%20this%20wrt%0A%20stable%20releases&In-Reply-To=%3C4F12F767.5060908%40arcor.de%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="011372.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="011318.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR &lt;= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases</H1>
    <B>Florian Hubold</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20FireFox%20ESR%20%3C%3D%20we%20should%20totally%20go%20for%20this%20wrt%0A%20stable%20releases&In-Reply-To=%3C4F12F767.5060908%40arcor.de%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR &lt;= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases">doktor5000 at arcor.de
       </A><BR>
    <I>Sun Jan 15 16:57:27 CET 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011372.html">[Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR &lt;= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011318.html">[Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR &lt;= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#11379">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#11379">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#11379">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#11379">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Am 15.01.2012 01:43, schrieb Luc Menut:
&gt;<i> Le 13/01/2012 02:22, D.Morgan a &#233;crit :
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Maarten Vanraes&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">alien at rmail.be</A>&gt;  wrote:
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> see <A HREF="https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-">https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-</A>
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> extended-support-release/
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> see <A HREF="https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/9/9d/Esr-release-overview.png">https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/9/9d/Esr-release-overview.png</A>
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> ESR is a 1y extended supported release...
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> looking at the image we'd be having supported versions for our 9month release
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> schedule every time... we should totally use this release and not go towards
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> FF11 for our release.
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> We've been complaining about the too quick release schedule... this is our
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> chance!
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> ( i think if the FF maintainer wishes, he could also do backports of the
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> regular releases... )
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> i'm hoping everyone agrees? including FF maintainer?
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> seems we should stuck to FF 10 as default release for mageia2.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> I don't have strong opinion about this choice.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> some various points that we should take into account:
</I>&gt;<i> - I didn't find recent official announcement about ESR for other mozilla
</I>&gt;<i> applications (Thunderbird, Seamonkey/Iceape, ...); I think that we should
</I>&gt;<i> have consistent versions, at least for Firefox and Thunderbird.
</I>This is not the case currently, we have latest stable Firefox, but Thunderbird
3.1 series
for mga1 as long as they're supported upstream (cf
<A HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/all-older.html">http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/all-older.html</A> )
and for Seamonkey we have a totally out-of-date rebranding called iceape,
which nobody seems interested in for stable release, with many
open security issues (cf other thread: &quot;[Mageia-dev] Seamonkey package&quot;)
&gt;<i> - mozilla updates without security fixes are uncommon, so we will not reduce
</I>&gt;<i> the number of update with ESR; the update will only have less changes, so
</I>&gt;<i> less risk of regressions.
</I>&gt;<i> - If we don't choose Firefox ESR, we should at least consider using ESR for
</I>&gt;<i> xulrunner.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>
</PRE>

















<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011372.html">[Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR &lt;= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="011318.html">[Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR &lt;= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#11379">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#11379">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#11379">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#11379">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>