1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20please%20stop%20doing%20%22bugs%22%20for%20updating%20magia%201&In-Reply-To=%3C4F0EAFEA.8070908%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="011275.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="011279.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1</H1>
<B>Guillaume Rousse</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20please%20stop%20doing%20%22bugs%22%20for%20updating%20magia%201&In-Reply-To=%3C4F0EAFEA.8070908%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1">guillomovitch at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Jan 12 11:03:22 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011275.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="011279.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#11277">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#11277">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#11277">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#11277">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 12/01/2012 10:27, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
><i> Each packager can decide if their upstream package is well-behaved or
</I>><i> not. Of course, better be conservative and not package bugfix releases
</I>><i> if you aren't totally confident. Still, some upstream teams *are*
</I>><i> well-behaved.
</I>Some means actually a very few minority among our thousands packages.
And even when upstream new release is perfectly safe, we're dealing with
binary updates here, meaning we also have to ensure the build
environment is perfectly similar (same compiler and build chain version,
for instance). Even today, when we try to always rebuild everything just
before release, we can't ensure it perfectly. This means there is no 0%
risk situation. Meaning we can never be perfectly confident.
Also, there is a responsability issue. Would you assume providing an
update disclaiming any kind of liability such as "here is a perfectly
safe update from us, but if it ever breaks anything, blame someone else" ?
All of this involves the need of a balance between involved work,
estimated risks, and expected benefits. The first factor being mostly
related to available workforce, you're welcome to join the team to
modify this balance.
--
BOFH excuse #392:
It's union rules. There's nothing we can do about it. Sorry.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011275.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="011279.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#11277">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#11277">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#11277">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#11277">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
