1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [packages-commits] [189967] - version upgrade
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bpackages-commits%5D%20%5B189967%5D%20-%20version%20upgrade&In-Reply-To=%3C4F05FBAC.9070500%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="010907.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="010992.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] [packages-commits] [189967] - version upgrade</H1>
<B>Matteo</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bpackages-commits%5D%20%5B189967%5D%20-%20version%20upgrade&In-Reply-To=%3C4F05FBAC.9070500%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [packages-commits] [189967] - version upgrade">pasotti.matteo at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Jan 5 20:36:12 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010907.html">[Mageia-dev] [packages-commits] [189967] - version upgrade
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="010992.html">[Mageia-dev] [packages-commits] [189967] - version upgrade
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#10990">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#10990">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#10990">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#10990">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 03/01/2012 17:30, Guillaume Rousse ha scritto:
><i> Le 03/01/2012 17:18, Jani Välimaa a écrit :
</I>>>><i> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
</I>>>><i> Group: System/Kernel and hardware
</I>>>><i> BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot
</I>>>><i> URL: <A HREF="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/x86info/">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/x86info/</A>
</I>>>><i> -Source0: %{name}-%{realver}%{?cvsdate:-%{cvsdate}}.tar.bz2
</I>>>><i> +Source0: %{name}-%{realver}%{?cvsdate:-%{cvsdate}}.tgz
</I>>>><i> Patch0: x86info-1.17-intel-flags.patch
</I>>>><i> Patch1: x86info-1.17-intel-caches.patch
</I>>>><i> Patch2: x86info-1.17-cpuid-with-ecx-input.patch
</I>>>><i> @@ -33,17 +33,18 @@
</I>>>><i> %setup -q -n %{name}-%{realver}
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> %build
</I>>>><i> -make CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
</I>>>><i> +#make CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
</I>>>><i> +%make
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> %install
</I>>>><i> -rm -rf %{buildroot}
</I>>>><i> -install -d %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
</I>>>><i> -install -d %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
</I>>>><i> -install -m755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/
</I>>>><i> -install -m755 %{name}.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
</I>>>><i> +%__rm -rf %{buildroot}
</I>>>><i> +%__install -d %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
</I>>>><i> +%__install -d %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
</I>>>><i> +%__install -m755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/
</I>>>><i> +%__install -m755 %{name}.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
</I>>>><i>
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> I think this is pretty much opposite what everyone else is doing. IMHO
</I>>><i> this also makes .spec harder to read.
</I>><i> Morevoer, it mixes pure cosmetics changes, as some of those macros just
</I>><i> expand to the command itself, as install vs %__install,
</I>Hi Guillaume,
I'm sorry, but I don't think that /usr/bin/install it's equal to
'install'. There are technical reasons to avoid these macros? Can you
suggest me some reference, please? I'm not able to find nothing about
this topic.
with behaviour
><i> changes, as other macros expand to the command with additional
</I>><i> arguments, as make vs %make, which is actually make -j.
</I>><i>
</I>So if I need to invoke make -j what should I do?
Again, excuse me -I'm not so skilled- but why should I avoid to call
make using -j option?
Be patient, please :-)
- --
Matteo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mageia - <A HREF="http://enigmail.mozdev.org/">http://enigmail.mozdev.org/</A>
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPBfuoAAoJED3LowjDDWbNZFIH/jDp/mS0Cw3yFIFHuOnBJ70y
tVw5z+D8DUf0SSOaXU5htnob9zXEg5fyl+adEcDb3s7XLl4Y/Bw5ER38YwHO4Kad
e5n/UnDCIuaWZeSkaRegMJRtu8mjCvnz4303M6VQbS/bopgbFZ5oTmVS5jM0YIEK
Qw35ACjrelcZSQy49HyDehbIT9g4jEvLSM+q7nEIF5EosQ1o+pnu/K6FtnCtD64V
bkUQcnvBoGTibqeD1dhI8dp7DPLEuc1GsZikxPctpSMmojwwZQP5lNyodkko3eyh
iQ3GAT/JSUZB2D8ysYSUgJUFR9hcgFtaETg5byo8vhUQFN9tgYRUzr4kjrO2v6I=
=NhEx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010907.html">[Mageia-dev] [packages-commits] [189967] - version upgrade
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="010992.html">[Mageia-dev] [packages-commits] [189967] - version upgrade
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#10990">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#10990">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#10990">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#10990">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
