summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/018122.html
blob: 0416579e5d1b2ee6672c5b206d4d9fc3ce9c38fe (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Task-obsolete%20and%20non-sense%20obsoletes&In-Reply-To=%3C20120813154933.GX21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="017974.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="018130.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes</H1>
    <B>nicolas vigier</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Task-obsolete%20and%20non-sense%20obsoletes&In-Reply-To=%3C20120813154933.GX21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes">boklm at mars-attacks.org
       </A><BR>
    <I>Mon Aug 13 17:49:33 CEST 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="017974.html">[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="018130.html">[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#18122">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#18122">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#18122">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#18122">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Tue, 07 Aug 2012, Pascal Terjan wrote:

&gt;<i> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Olivier Thauvin
</I>&gt;<i> &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">nanardon at nanardon.zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Hi,
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Many people already complain about it, but for me task-obsolete must
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; die.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> I don't think so, but people should not be allowed to add random
</I>&gt;<i> obsoletes there.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; First I just remove but urpmi claim it must come back on my system...
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; probably because it claim to replace lib64db5.2, even maybe still need
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; it.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Secondly it contains non-sense dependencies:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Obsoletes: lib64db5.2 &lt; 5.2.42-3
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Any lib64db5.2 over this version will by definition obsoletes any
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; packages having same name.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; So this mean anyone can keep the lib64db5.2 as soon the release tag
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; is increased or someone push into mga 2 / update any libdb higher
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; than 5.2.42 (5.2.43 for example).
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Moreover, any package lacking of requirements during an upgrade is
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; removed by urpmi.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I no-one complain, I'll do a major cleanup (eg removing everything at
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; least everything starting by lib) in package this week
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; But I am still in favor to remove it. In past, package we didn't want to
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; support anymore was just removed from mirrors, and this was enough to
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; show their status.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> But people will not be notified of it.
</I>&gt;<i> If a system is obsolete with the new distribution and known to break
</I>&gt;<i> things/contain major security problems, I think having a place to put
</I>&gt;<i> the obsoletes is good.
</I>&gt;<i> But really I wouldn't expect more than 2 or 3 such packages in a release...
</I>
Maybe we could change task-obsolete to conflict with obsolete packages
instead of obsoleting them :
- people who want to remove unsupported packages from their system
  install task-obsolete
- people who don't want to remove unsupported packages don't install
  task-obsolete

This will also make urpmi/rpmdrake warn before removing packages,
instead of silently removing them.

</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="017974.html">[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018130.html">[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#18122">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#18122">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#18122">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#18122">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>