1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Task-obsolete%20and%20non-sense%20obsoletes&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2BbgWdpHHrOhEEkh5Qt7gzSpgxbmB1dE0W6t92RDD1tDxoA%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="017970.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="017972.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes</H1>
<B>Pascal Terjan</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Task-obsolete%20and%20non-sense%20obsoletes&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2BbgWdpHHrOhEEkh5Qt7gzSpgxbmB1dE0W6t92RDD1tDxoA%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes">pterjan at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Aug 7 13:39:51 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="017970.html">[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="017972.html">[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#17971">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#17971">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#17971">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#17971">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Olivier Thauvin
<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">nanardon at nanardon.zarb.org</A>> wrote:
><i> Hi,
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Many people already complain about it, but for me task-obsolete must
</I>><i> die.
</I>
I don't think so, but people should not be allowed to add random
obsoletes there.
><i> First I just remove but urpmi claim it must come back on my system...
</I>><i> probably because it claim to replace lib64db5.2, even maybe still need
</I>><i> it.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Secondly it contains non-sense dependencies:
</I>><i> Obsoletes: lib64db5.2 < 5.2.42-3
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Any lib64db5.2 over this version will by definition obsoletes any
</I>><i> packages having same name.
</I>><i> So this mean anyone can keep the lib64db5.2 as soon the release tag
</I>><i> is increased or someone push into mga 2 / update any libdb higher
</I>><i> than 5.2.42 (5.2.43 for example).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Moreover, any package lacking of requirements during an upgrade is
</I>><i> removed by urpmi.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I no-one complain, I'll do a major cleanup (eg removing everything at
</I>><i> least everything starting by lib) in package this week
</I>><i>
</I>><i> But I am still in favor to remove it. In past, package we didn't want to
</I>><i> support anymore was just removed from mirrors, and this was enough to
</I>><i> show their status.
</I>
But people will not be notified of it.
If a system is obsolete with the new distribution and known to break
things/contain major security problems, I think having a place to put
the obsoletes is good.
But really I wouldn't expect more than 2 or 3 such packages in a release...
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="017970.html">[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="017972.html">[Mageia-dev] Task-obsolete and non-sense obsoletes
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#17971">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#17971">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#17971">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#17971">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
