blob: 11496495fe71b58a5d8574472e01facd0031a8d5 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Xfce%204.10%20released&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOkW%3Dmw5C8w2raOw2YZ3T%3D0XxpF5j%2B_2xWR-Jr_DFu%2But-nVSw%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="015013.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="015023.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released</H1>
<B>You-Cheng Hsieh</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Xfce%204.10%20released&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOkW%3Dmw5C8w2raOw2YZ3T%3D0XxpF5j%2B_2xWR-Jr_DFu%2But-nVSw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released">yochenhsieh at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Apr 29 13:28:57 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015013.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="015023.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#15014">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#15014">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#15014">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#15014">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>2012/4/29 Jani Välimaa <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">jani.valimaa at gmail.com</A>>:
><i> On 29.04.2012 12:55, zezinho wrote:
</I>>><i> Em 29-04-2012 09:43, Jani Välimaa escreveu:
</I>>>><i> I know it's not the right time for this, but I'm wondering if we could
</I>>>><i> push new Xfce 4.10 also to updates for upcoming mga2?
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Only when backports media is available : there is no reason to change
</I>>><i> our policy for updates.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> We don't need to change our policy, only turn a blind eye to it. And as
</I>><i> we don't have backport repos yet and haven't seen any progress making
</I>><i> them available, updates are the only choice. Also, it was done for KDE
</I>><i> update in mga1. So, why not for another DE?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Currently we have a mixture of unstable (4.10 pre) and stable (4.8) Xfce
</I>><i> pkgs in our repos. IMHO it would be good to have stable versions
</I>><i> available to provide as good user experience for Xfce users as possible.
</I>><i> I've heard that some users switched to another distro because our Xfce
</I>><i> is outdated in mga1. I don't want to see this happening again.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> P.S. I'm fine to push new Xfce to backports, but we really need to do
</I>><i> something to make backports available after mga2 release.
</I>
Are xfce 4.9.x considered as development/testing/unstable releases?
If so, I think pushing the stable 4.10 release into mageia2 still fits
our policy.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015013.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="015023.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#15014">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#15014">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#15014">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#15014">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
