1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] bumblebee in mageia (and mentoring)
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bumblebee%20in%20mageia%20%28and%20mentoring%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201204102153.38942.alien%40rmail.be%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="014106.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="014111.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] bumblebee in mageia (and mentoring)</H1>
<B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bumblebee%20in%20mageia%20%28and%20mentoring%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201204102153.38942.alien%40rmail.be%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] bumblebee in mageia (and mentoring)">alien at rmail.be
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Apr 10 21:53:38 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="014106.html">[Mageia-dev] bumblebee in mageia (and mentoring)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="014111.html">[Mageia-dev] bumblebee in mageia (and mentoring)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#14112">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#14112">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#14112">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#14112">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op dinsdag 10 april 2012 21:28:19 schreef simple w8:
[...]
><i> > better to follow the policy.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I dont know about mageia policies, but i will read about them so i can
</I>><i> start using them from now on.
</I>
check <A HREF="https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Policies">https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Policies</A> , you don't have to read all of
them, but it's nice to look at what kind of policies exist, so that later you
can look them up if required.
[...]
><i> > you can afterwards make a kmod-bbswitch and kmod-acpi_call packages that
</I>><i> > make prebuilt modules for all available kernels.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Yeap, i have seen those kind of packages and that way theres no need
</I>><i> to use a dkms.
</I>
well, except to actually build the kmod package, since it requires the dkms
package :-)
[...]
><i> > perhaps filetriggers or the post and preun service helpers do all this
</I>><i> > automagically... i don't know, i usually just look at other packages.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > i think a provided existing service file is picked up by filetriggers
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I do see one systemd filetrigger: systemd-daemon-reload.script
</I>><i>
</I>><i> but i would like to know hows processed, so far for what i have seen i
</I>><i> dont see how that is possible, to put systemd running services without
</I>><i> put them in the scripts.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> And to remember that bumblebee is provided with service files for
</I>><i> systemd and sysvinit, i did had that caution, thats why i put in
</I>><i> scripts bbbbboth usage.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Still i think it would be better to simply keep the ones for systemd,
</I>><i> since its the one used by default.
</I>
well, if i was you, comment out the code and see if it actually does enable it
by default. i'm definately not an expert, but for mariadb i didn't have to
enable it, it worked like that...
since i have not seen any other packages where it effectively does that, i
don't think it's required.
[...]
><i> > iinm you can also add extra option to %cmake. if it's possible it'd be
</I>><i> > nice to have %cmake in it. if there would be systemwide changes at a
</I>><i> > later time, possibly due to changed newer cmake behavior, or whatever,
</I>><i> > it can be picked up without much effort.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > also it looks better to me, having all cmake packages using %cmake :-)
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Did you read what i wrote?
</I>
?
of course i did, why else would i take the effort to reply?
><i> i did tried to use %cmake but build fails, so its really need to use
</I>><i> it explicitely like its currently, and the same goes for when i did
</I>><i> not used %makeinstall_std in libbsd.
</I>
well as you already know, %cmake evaluates to cmake with some extra stuff, so
if one of these things give you difficulty, either it points to a point that can
be improved, or you can just override them for the ones you need. that way,
you can still make it work with %cmake.
[...]
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="014106.html">[Mageia-dev] bumblebee in mageia (and mentoring)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="014111.html">[Mageia-dev] bumblebee in mageia (and mentoring)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#14112">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#14112">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#14112">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#14112">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
