blob: 3e4a72310d3ccfe727deeb6aab61dbbfba86baf1 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Providing 32-bit flash-player-plugin in x86_64 nonfree?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Providing%2032-bit%20flash-player-plugin%20in%20x86_64%0A%09nonfree%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4DEC3A35.5020206%40laposte.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005157.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="005172.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Providing 32-bit flash-player-plugin in x86_64 nonfree?</H1>
<B>andre999</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Providing%2032-bit%20flash-player-plugin%20in%20x86_64%0A%09nonfree%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4DEC3A35.5020206%40laposte.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Providing 32-bit flash-player-plugin in x86_64 nonfree?">andr55 at laposte.net
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Jun 6 04:23:49 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005157.html">[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release mgaonline-2.77.27-2.mga1
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005172.html">[Mageia-dev] Support timeframe for mageia 1 ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#5158">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#5158">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#5158">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#5158">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
><i>
</I>><i> Op zondag 05 juni 2011 21:55:57 schreef andre999:
</I>><i> [...]
</I>>><i> That makes 6 months -- so it seems likely that we should expect a final
</I>>><i> version soon. Adobe is probably being (overly) cautious.
</I>><i> [...]
</I>><i>
</I>><i> That's some real optimist wishful thinking...
</I>><i>
</I>><i> iirc last time it was "released" it took several previews which lasted each
</I>><i> 3months or more...
</I>
You could well be right :)
That makes me think of some open source software that stays in pre 1.0 versions for years ... not
because it's really unstable, there's just always some other feature to add ...
In any case, nothing to stop anyone from trying the currently available "square" 64-bit version in
tar format.
--
André
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005157.html">[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release mgaonline-2.77.27-2.mga1
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005172.html">[Mageia-dev] Support timeframe for mageia 1 ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#5158">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#5158">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#5158">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#5158">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|