summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110529/005079.html
blob: bcc0add3e720d9530a3f0e120b9cafd7c368ef8a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] regarding tainted progress
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20regarding%20tainted%20progress&In-Reply-To=%3C201105291658.53663.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="005078.html">
   
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] regarding tainted progress</H1>
    <B>Maarten Vanraes</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20regarding%20tainted%20progress&In-Reply-To=%3C201105291658.53663.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] regarding tainted progress">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Sun May 29 16:58:53 CEST 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005078.html">[Mageia-dev] regarding tainted progress
</A></li>
        
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5079">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5079">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5079">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5079">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op zondag 29 mei 2011 14:07:59 schreef Michael Scherer:
&gt;<i> Le dimanche 29 mai 2011 &#224; 12:50 +0200, Maarten Vanraes a &#233;crit :
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Op zondag 29 mei 2011 12:05:26 schreef Michael Scherer:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Le dimanche 29 mai 2011 &#224; 11:52 +0200, Maarten Vanraes a &#233;crit :
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; Hi,
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; I've spoken with spturtle about the tainted packages rebuild of
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; existing packages (ffmpeg, mplayer,...)
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; He mentions he did local builds of those, and is waiting on a BS
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; change?
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Everything is on the bug report
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; <A HREF="https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338">https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338</A> ( that you likely could not
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; miss )
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I suppose i should've put the link in my email...
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Personally, I think this can be fixed after with updates ( ie push
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; updated rpms with support for specific codecs after the release is out
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; ) so this should not be release critical.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I kind of disagree with you here on 2 points:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;  - I estimate(wild guess) that if there is even 4hours between release
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;  and
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; these packages appearing, that you're already gonna have at least one
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; person complaining about it
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> And so ? I think that I clearly articulated my point about complain in
</I>&gt;<i> the past, something about &quot;patch or you do not exist&quot;, some ruthless
</I>&gt;<i> motto geared toward efficiency.
</I>
i guess i'm not that ruthless

&gt;<i> More precisely, how many people would complain if the release do not
</I>&gt;<i> appear in time, after having worked so hard to meet the deadline ?
</I>
you have a point there, also people always complain

&gt;<i> &gt;  - If you say, after release is fine; then it'll likely take more than a
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;  week
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; after release to have those packages on the mirrors, because at that
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; point people will just want to &quot;fix&quot; the BS the correct way...
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> Technically, even before, it should be the right way. We had enough
</I>&gt;<i> issues with stuff &quot;that will be fixed later&quot; on Mandriva side that I
</I>&gt;<i> think we learned the lesson, like &quot;we will clean the buildsystem later&quot;
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> ( so it was running forked version of youri, with no spec on how it
</I>&gt;<i> work, with script auto correcting mirrors silently, etc )
</I>
There's no way i can not agree with you on this.

Except, i thought this was decided...

In any case, spturtle seems to have everything ready and is waiting for 
&quot;something&quot; or perhaps some way to put it there?

I only sent this email as reminder because spturtle asked me to do so...
</PRE>

<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005078.html">[Mageia-dev] regarding tainted progress
</A></li>
	
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5079">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5079">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5079">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5079">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>