blob: 9af0e9eacf1a28e83b34ee8a44b740ce780cf541 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5B496%5D%20update%20version%20in%20Makefile&In-Reply-To=%3C4D546CC7.8070001%40iki.fi%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002527.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002529.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile</H1>
<B>Thomas Backlund</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5B496%5D%20update%20version%20in%20Makefile&In-Reply-To=%3C4D546CC7.8070001%40iki.fi%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile">tmb at iki.fi
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Feb 10 23:55:03 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002527.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002529.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2528">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2528">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2528">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2528">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Blinov Vyacheslav skrev 11.2.2011 00:49:
><i> В сообщении от Пятница 11 февраля 2011 01:28:47 автор nicolas vigier написал:
</I>>><i> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Blinov Vyacheslav wrote:
</I>>>><i> For a people who are not familiar with disto year/month model is more
</I>>>><i> usefull, cause its easier to understand how recent is this version,
</I>>>><i> rather then "version 4" that does not talks. If you haven't heard about
</I>>>><i> Alt Linux than what can you say about Alt 5? How much time passed since
</I>>>><i> it was released?
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> And you need to be able to see this information from the release number ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> As 4 me, I don't see any difference.
</I>><i> I just thought about newcomers.
</I>><i> Both naming models have they own benefits to be good, so it just a matter of
</I>><i> taste, and my taste tolds me numbering looks nicer while version number is
</I>><i> not about 20.
</I>
Well, the downside of using a year as a release number, is that after a
year, people will think that the release is old... even if its still
supported...
--
Thomas
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002527.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002529.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2528">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2528">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2528">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2528">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|